BC Transmission Corporation

Applications for Reconsideration of the Commission’s July 7, 2006 Decision and Order No. C-4-06 on the British Columbia Transmission Corporation Vancouver Island Transmission Reinforcement Project

Completed: 2006

Hearing and Other Documents

Title Document Description
*_Document List Updated: September 29, 2006 @ 10:00 am
1 Commission Letter dated July 26, 2006 denying Mr. Harley Anfinson’s application for reconsideration of the VITR Decision
2 Letter of Comment from Anne and/or Paul Thomas - Email dated July 17, 2006
6 Letter dated August 8, 2006 from Mr. David Austin, Tupper Jonsson & Yeadon filing a copy of the Island Residents Against Higher Voltage Overhead Lines (IRAHVOL) Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal
7 Letter dated August 8, 2006 from Joseph Arvay, Arvay Finlay filing a copy of the Tsawwassen Residents Against Higher Voltage Overhead Lines Society (TRAHVOL) Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal
8 Court of Appeal File No. CA034341 – Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal of Sea Breeze Victoria Converter Corporation (Sea Breeze) stamped August 8, 2006
9 Letter dated August 10, 2006 from Commission Counsel to TRAHVOL filing a copy of the Notice of Appearance on behalf of the British Columbia Utilities Commission
10 Letter dated August 10, 2006 from Commission Counsel to Mr. Neil Atchison filing a copy of the Notice of Appearance on behalf of the British Columbia Utilities Commission
11 Letter dated August 10, 2006 from Commission Counsel to IRAHVOL filing a copy of the Notice of Appearance on behalf of the British Columbia Utilities Commission
12 Letter dated August 10, 2006 from Commission Counsel to Sea Breeze filing a copy of the Notice of Appearance on behalf of the British Columbia Utilities Commission
13 Commission Letter dated August 11, 2006 to British Columbia Transmission Corporation and Registered Intervenors/Interested Parties to the Vancouver Island Transmission Reinforcement Project proceeding establishing a written comment process on the Sutherland Reconsideration Request (Doc No. 5)
14 Facsimile dated August 16, 2006 from Commission Counsel filing a copy of the Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal made by Mr. Neil Atchison, P.Eng.
15 Email dated August 30, 2006 from Karsten Holmsen stating inadequate information has been provided regarding the reconsideration process
16 Email dated August 30, 2006 from Donna McGeachie, British Columbia Transmission Corporation, regarding the reconsideration article in the Delta Optimist
17 Email dated August 30, 2006 from Donna McGeachie, British Columbia Transmission Corporation, regarding the media coverage in the Delta Optimist, Vancouver Sun and on CKNW Radio regarding the application for reconsideration
18 Court of Appeal File No. CA034341 – Notice of Motion and Affidavit of British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority stamped September 1, 2006
19 Commission Letter dated September 1, 2006 to the Editor of the Vancouver Sun
20 Letter dated September 1, 2006 from Valerie Roddick, MLA – Delta South supporting the Sutherland reconsideration request
21 Letter received September 1, 2006 from Bill Sharkey supporting the Sutherland reconsideration request
22 Letter of Comment dated September 4, 2006 from Mary-Rose Rasmussen
23 Letter dated September 5, 2006 from Mr. & Mrs. Tony Lutejn to the Honourable Gordon Campbell
24 Letter dated September 5, 2006 from British Columbia Transmission Corporation Counsel to the BC Court of Appeal confirming that all four appeals will be heard together by a single Justice
25 Letter dated September 6, 2006 from Brad Campbell commenting on the reconsideration request and requesting that the Commission hear new evidence in regard to the project
26 Email dated September 7, 2006 from Jack Bulloch providing written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
27 Letter dated September 8, 2006 from Karsten Holmsen providing written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
28 Letter dated September 8, 2006 from TRAHVOL providing its written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
29 Letter dated September 28 [8], 2006 from the Corporation of Delta providing its written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
30 Letter dated September 8, 2006 from British Columbia Transmission Corporation responding to the Sutherland reconsideration request
31 Letter dated September 8, 2006 from the Canadian Cancer Society providing its written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
32 Letter received September 13, 2006 from Ronald Helferty providing written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
33 Letter dated September 12, 2006 from the Corporation of Delta to Mr. Garry Alexander, Environmental Assessment Office responding to BCTC’s Addendum Report (July 2006) relating to the VITRP overhead section through Tsawwassen
34 Letter dated September 13, 2006 from the Tsawwassen First Nation providing written comments on the Sutherland reconsideration request
35 Email dated September 15, 2006 from Maureen Broadfoot (TRAHVOL) filing a copy of the Canadian Cancer Society article entitled “Inconclusive evidence suggest practical avoidance: Canadian Cancer Society statement to Environmental Assessment Office on Tsawwassen power line project”
36 Letter dated September 15, 2006 from Sea Breeze requesting a reconsideration of the Commission’s July 7, 2006 Decision
37 Letter dated September 16, 2006 from Maureen Broadfoot (TRAHVOL) to Premier Gordon Campbell re: Canadian Cancer Society’s recommendation to revise transmission plan
38 Letter dated April 1, 2006 (received September 16, 2006) from Richard Neufeld, Minister, Ministry of Energy, Mines & Petroleum Resources to Maureen Broadfoot
39 Email dated September 16, 2006 from Maureen Broadfoot (TRAHVOL) filing a copy of the Delta Optimist article entitled “Revise power lines proposal, Canadian Cancer Society recommends”
40 Letter dated September 18, 2006 from British Columbia Transmission Corporation responding to Mr. Karsten Holmsen’s correspondence of September 13, 2006
41 Commission Letter No. L-56-06 dated September 18, 2006 to Sea Breeze and Registered Intervenors/Interested Parties responding to Sea Breeze’s request for reconsideration (Doc. No. 36)
42 Letter dated September 20, 2006 from TRAHVOL Counsel advising that due to a possible conflict of interest, they will not be representing TRAHVOL before the Commission in respect of any reconsideration applications
43 Letter of Comment dated September 21, 2006 from Carroll Lefebvre
44 Email dated September 22, 2006 from Bernie Dohmann to Premier Gordon Campbell regarding the Tsawwassen transmission lines and electromagnetic fields
45 Letters of Comment dated September 22, 2006 from Barry and Shirley Claridge
46 Letter of Comment dated September 25, 2006 from Keith F. Dinwoodie
47 Letter dated September 25, 2006 from Commission Counsel filing an Amended Notice of Leave to Appeal for Sea Breeze
48 Letter dated September 26, 2006 from British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority opposing the Sea Breeze application for reconsideration (Doc. No. 36)
49 Letter dated September 26, 2006 from British Columbia Transmission Corporation responding to the Sea Breeze application for reconsideration (Doc. No. 36)
50 Letter dated September 28, 2006 filing written comments from Pam Sutherland, Kyong Nam and Mark Warwarick regarding BCTC’s September 26, 2006 letter (Doc No. 49)

Our Review Process

Learn more about how we review applications, which are submitted to us by the entities we regulate. You'll see the types of reviews we conduct and how you can get involved in the process.

Learn more